For a DataRaptor extraction that reads a Contact and its Account name, which configuration is correct?

For a DataRaptor extraction that reads a Contact and its Account name, which configuration is correct?

• A. Define an extraction step for the Contact object and set the Extract JSON Path to Contact:Account.Name
• B. Define extraction steps for the Contact and the Account objects, and set the Extract JSON Path to Contact.Account.Name
• C. Define extraction steps for the Account object, and set the Extract JSON Path to Account.Name
• D. Define extraction steps for the Contact object only, and set the Extract JSON Path to Contact.Account.Name

Answer: (B)

This tests retrieving related records in a DataRaptor Extract. To read a Contact and also pull the name of its related Account, you must configure extraction steps for both the Contact and the related Account, and reference the related field through the relationship path Contact.Account.Name. Defining both objects ensures the extractor actually fetches the Account data alongside the Contact, and using the path Contact.Account.Name correctly navigates the lookup from Contact to its Account to reach the Account name. If you only extract the Contact or only the Account, you won’t have the necessary context to obtain the related Account’s name, or you’d be missing the Contact fields entirely.

This tests retrieving related records in a DataRaptor Extract. To read a Contact and also pull the name of its related Account, you must configure extraction steps for both the Contact and the related Account, and reference the related field through the relationship path Contact.Account.Name. Defining both objects ensures the extractor actually fetches the Account data alongside the Contact, and using the path Contact.Account.Name correctly navigates the lookup from Contact to its Account to reach the Account name. If you only extract the Contact or only the Account, you won’t have the necessary context to obtain the related Account’s name, or you’d be missing the Contact fields entirely.